Medical research is not funded by selfies


My facebook timeline was flooded with selfies this morning. Bare-faced, no-filter (ahem) selfies, posted by friends in the name of cancer awareness and asking others to do the same. In my usual bleary-eyed, early morning confusion I couldn’t understand why, on a social networking site where most of us scroll mindlessly through the interminable selfies of the people on our friends list every single day, another selfie would help cure cancer. By mid-morning (OK, by midday) I was more awake but still none the wiser.

A few years ago there was an unofficial facebook campaign intended to raise awareness about breast cancer – women were encouraging each other to post the colour of their bra in a veiled status update along the lines of ‘Red’ or ‘My favourite colour is black’ or whatever. The idea was that people would see this happening all over their timeline, would ask what it was all about and then the person who had posted the status would let them know that it was about promoting breast cancer awareness.

Quick and simple. Awareness spread. Warm feelings all round. Marvellous.

I received four of these covert inbox messages from women on my friends list, with an instruction about what to put in my status in order to pique people’s interest. However, only one of these private messages referenced raising awareness of breast cancer. The other three said that this was a fun joke intended to confuse men and generally ‘get some LOLs’. Similar campaigns happened over the next couple years – where do you keep your handbag? ‘I like it on the floor’, nudge nudge, wink wink. Again, the emphasis was on confusion and primarily the confusion of men. Yes, men get breast cancer too but how would a nonsensical status update about the colour of my bra help a guy find the information he needed about this, should he be concerned? Wouldn’t women reading the status updates be better served by a link to details of how to check their breasts for cancer? The intention was good but somewhere along the line the message had been lost.

That’s not to say that I think these campaigns were ultimately pointless – anything that gets people talking about cancer awareness is, of course, a good thing – but the lack of a direct link to a cause WILL lead to the dilution of the message. And cancer isn’t a saucy, suggestive, Carry On-style joke. In 2011 (the most recent official statistics available), 331,000 people were diagnosed with cancer in the UK alone and 159,000 people died from cancer in the UK in the same year. Making a bewildering statement about the colour of my underwear just didn’t seem action enough to me.

Facebook has, perhaps inevitably, become a haven for pious armchair activism. The idea that if you ‘like/share if you agree’ then you are actually contributing to a cure for cancer or to the eradication of the fur farming industry or similar is as absurd as it is self-indulgent. The message is that just one click of your mouse (So easy! You don’t even have to move!) can save a life.

It can’t. It doesn’t.

Working in publishing, I am very aware of how important social networking is when disseminating information but what saves lives is directly engaging with the causes that you feel strongly about – fundraising, protest, sustained comprehensive awareness campaigns and the support of intensive medical research where appropriate, alongside support of local hospices who work closely with terminally ill patients to help manage their physical and emotional needs in the last years of their lives. Your picture of a skinned dog, prefaced with a sad-face emoticon, is more likely to get people to hide your updates in their timeline than jump up and do something about it, nor does your willingness to post such an image make you a stronger advocate for the cause than someone who chooses not to. Similarly, just because a trend says that it is about raising cancer awareness doesn’t mean that you have to blindly follow suit. It is important to question if what a campaign is encouraging you to do is actually helping the cause to which it has aligned itself. HOW does your selfie with no makeup on raise cancer awareness or contribute to a cure? The bare-faced female selfie movement has been gathering speed for a while now, as a backlash against the endless tweaked, filtered, camera-over-the-head selfies that flood the internet, themselves the spawn of the photoshopped, fantasy images of women with which we are relentlessly bombarded by the media. This is a good thing – a reminder of what women’s faces actually look like without a half-inch of makeup and the Amaro filter on – but, when it comes to finding a cure for cancer your face is not your most powerful (or your most sustainable) resource.

By all means, post your selfies. Just make sure that you also tell people why you are doing it, link them to some useful information and put your money where your lipstick-free mouth is.

Make a £3 donation to Cancer Research UK by texting BEAT to 70099
Cancer Research UK
Marie Curie Cancer Care
Macmillan Cancer Support
St Luke’s Hospice

This post is also published here: The Huffington Post UK.

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

6 thoughts on “Medical research is not funded by selfies

  1. Good piece, Emma. The road to hell is paved with good intentions and we do seem to be living in an age where people who should know better think they can save the world with a click.

  2. Lesley p says:

    Not everyone has the intellect or disposable income that you obviously have and if sitting in an armchair, remembering their grandma, mum, sister etc, taking a make up less selfie and promoting the awareness of cancer research is their only way of helping, then let them be. Any awareness is good promotion. Personally I think there is a cure but I’m not going to be so arrogant or egotistical in ‘slagging’ off those who want to join in and promote.

    Plus, that text messaging number that you are promoting by giving £3 to the cause, well you get charged for a text and a maximum of £2.95 goes to the charity not the full £3.00.

    • Hi Lesley,

      Thank you for your comment.

      I don’t have a lot of disposable income at all, though I am able to make a small monthly donation to Cancer Research UK which I appreciate that not everyone can afford to do. I am also sympathetic to those that have lost people to cancer – I have lost people close to me to the disease too, as well as having had two terrifying breast cancer scares myself. This article isn’t intended to ‘slag off’ anyone, just to raise questions about how effective an action like this is in directly helping the cause that it is linked to. The effectiveness of the action doesn’t have to be financial, either – sharing a link to a guide about how to recognise signs of cancer when sharing an awareness selfie, for example, is hugely beneficial and is, in my opinion, more effective than the selfie alone.

      The text message number is the official one given by Cancer Research UK. Personally I think that £2.95 out of £3.00 is well worth the cost of the text.

  3. claire c says:

    Well said Emma.I particularly like your mention of “armchair activism”.We are bombarded with images on Facebook daily,and easy “likes” and clicks.They may serve to “raise awareness” (two words which in themselves have become somewhat blurred in meaning or cliched!), but ,think,what intention is behind it,how is it helping ,and what image is it projecting?In my view many of the women-centric viral find raising campaigns,well-meaning though they are, have a less healthy undertone .If people only have that one means of donating and contributing,we should not criticise,but all should be aware how the internet sometimes makes us lazy,complacent and prone to bandwagon-jumping.And for those genuinely posting in memory of their family member or friend who died of cancer,no criticism is intended at all…though personally I’d rather see happy pictures of the person concerned by way of tribute,not some selfie pic.

    • Thank you, Claire. Completely agree about the unhealthy undertones of some female-centric fundraising campaigns, the selfie one in particular. Lots of ‘…but you are STILL beautiful, hun!’ comments on photos (as if that was the point of the photo), just serving to reinforce the idea that a woman’s value lies primarily in her attractiveness.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: